Marathon training or simply love going for a bike ride? Turn your phone into a sophisticated cycle or running tracker with Strava. Try out a new trail with Strava distance tracker and mile counter or even track running speed. Join millions of active people and reach your goals!
Strava Running and Cycling GPS Mod
Strava turns every iPhone and Android into a sophisticated running and cycling computer (and we work with your GPS watches and head units, too). Start Strava before an activity and you can track your favorite performance stats, and afterwards, dive deep into your data.
Running, cycling, and the app meticulously document swimming activities, and your progress over time is compared to your previous results. The Strava tracker allows gamers to keep track of their training progress and calculate the number of calories they have expended. Provide consumers with a plethora of useful features that will assist them in understanding what they are doing.
Train you to master the three swimming, running, and cycling sports for users. Strava tracker helps your skills improve more and more. Through the monitoring process, create effective plans to increase operational efficiency significantly. The mile counter becomes your personal trainer, helping you along the way.
Bundle ID: com.strava.stravarideiTunes Link: -running-and-cycling-gps/id426826309?mt=8Mod Requirements:- Jailbroken iPhone/iPad/iPod Touch.- iFile / Filza / iFunBox / iTools or any other file managers for iOS.- Cydia Substrate (from Cydia).- PreferenceLoader (from Cydia).
Strava: Track Running, Cycling & Swimming Mod Apk: Strava Activity Tracker allows you to track your health and fitness. Track your runs and bike routes, and map them out on Strava. Get all your stats for no cost!Do you love to ride a bicycle? Are you training for marathons? Strava turns your smartphone into an advanced running or cycling tracker. Strava Distance tracker, mile counter and even running speed can help you create a new route. Get active with millions of others and achieve your goals.
So ultimately, the Vivoactive 4 optical HR accuracy seems a bit mixed. On easier scenarios (which is any form of indoor cycling) it seems to fumble the most. Heck, even during some running warm-ups it fumbles a bit. Yet for harder scenarios like the 800m intervals, it actually does fairly well, which matches what I saw with other track workouts too. For outdoor cycling, it shows the occasional dips/spikes that we see indoors, albeit at less frequency. It did have trouble descending.
This is a dual ANT+/Bluetooth Smart cycling cadence sensor that you strap to your crank arm, but also does dual Bluetooth Smart, so you can pair it both to Zwift and another Bluetooth Smart app at once if you want.
Long time listener, first time caller. Amazing review as usual! Just a quick question, are the issues with the optical HR sensor software related that Garmin intends to rectify soon? I definitely find that the HR tracking on mine is practically unusable when cycling, super disappointing compared to the VA3 and VA3 Music that I have had before this. Thanks!
DanielleI had similar issue (original Vivoactive) until I realised I could configure one of the walking screens to show actual time as a field. Also with both indoor and outdoor cycling. So yes you can do it on your current watch, so presume (hope!) you can do it on the newer ones.
I am a petite female. I currently wear a VA for daily use because of its size and switch to a FR230 for running because I like to have 4 data fields to see last lap pace v. current lap pace. I am looking to upgrade to a single watch and am considering the Venu SQ and the VA4s. It is my understanding that the Venu SQ only has three data fields per screen, but that the VA4s has four. Is that correct?
Would love to know your opinion with this versus the Garmin Venu. After reading and researching A LOT it really just seems like it comes down to battery life and AMOLED display. But after reading your review here, it seems like the HR is slightly better on the Venu. Any tips on that? I do a lot of indoor spin cycling, HIIT workouts and outdoor running and having decent HR is important to me. That said, I usually use my Polar H10 chest strap and know it can get connected.
So what would be better the garmin vivoactive 4 or the polar vantage m2? I use it mainly for gym and some running though I am not too concerned about gps accuracy. The music functionality of the garmin would be nice to have but it is not something I really need.
Thanks for a very thorough review. It helped me decide to get one during Amazon Prime days. A note that I was pleasantly surprised when I selected indoor cycling workout mode and it automatically found my Tacx trainer and captured distance and speed.
I share this story often with the runners I coach who are skeptical about the potential for a cross-training heavy training program to deliver the performances they seek in running events. Most runners who lack extensive cross-training experience doubt its effectiveness, which is completely understandable. I mean, how the heck is riding a bike or using an elliptical machine supposed to make you a better runner?
One thing is certain: Three-thirds cross-training is a bridge too far! A 2012 study by David Honea of Appalachian State University found that 3000m time trial performance decreased in high school runners who replaced all of their running with cross-training for five weeks, whereas times improved in controls who continued running.
Speaking as a coach, not as a scientist, I believe that three runs per week is the minimum frequency of running required to avoid lowering performance expectations on a combined running/cross-training regimen. As for how much cross-training to do on top of that, I say the more, the better.
Something to keep in mind, should you choose to go down this path, is that not all cross-training is equal. The more similar to running your chosen cross-training modality is, the more effectively the fitness you develop within it will transfer over to running.
This was shown in a 1995 study led by Carl Foster of the Milwaukee Heart Institute. For eight weeks, 30 runners increased their training volume either through additional running or through swimming, an upper-body dominant, non-weight-bearing activity that is highly dissimilar to running. Both groups improved their 5K performance more than controls who continued with their normal run training, but the swim group improved only half as much as those who ran more. Compare these results to those of the previously described study in which the addition of cycling (a legs-dominant, semi-weight-bearing activity) to a running program improved performance by the same amount as extra running. 2ff7e9595c
Comments